Do not use this company. They do not help you at the end of a tenancy. They are completely on landlords side. I took a room in a house share (1 other person who I never saw) from seeing photos only as I was in Belfast. I moved out of a property within less than 1 month as it was disgusting and uninhabitable. I suffered an injury on a rusty, badly broken tap. The landlord accepted me terminating the tenancy early but is now trying to claim for cleaning and mattress steam. The first 4 photos are the disgusting state it was in and the rusty broken tap and the other 3 the bedroom as I left it Decide for yourselves who is right and wrong! I am quite happy to discuss this in court I DID NOTIFY YOU THAT I WAS NOT ACCEPTING ANY CHARGES WITHIN THE CORRECT TIMEFRAME BUT YOU INSIST ON ME PAYING £60 TO DISPUTE IT WHICH I REFUSE TO DO!!!!!! SHOCKING SERVICE AND THE PUBLIC NEED TO BE AWARE!!!
Absolutely appalling! Trying to charge me £1833 in illegal end of tenancy fees 4 months after I moved out of the property, and then trying to make me pay £60 within 7 days (the 7 days before payday coincidentally) just for the chance to dispute it is an absolute joke. The communication has been dreadful and entirely unhelpful. I have an ongoing case with the Property Ombudsman regarding the charges, but they are still pursuing the money I allegedly owe, and had threatened legal action (I owe nothing, the charges made against me are entirely unfair and unjustified, as the check in inventory comments on everything I have tried to be charged for before I even moved in). They also failed to add my housemate to the policy and didn't send me any correspondence about this, so he now has no liability for any of these charges despite living there for nearly a year. Sort yourselves out and stop ripping off the people who have nothing. Disgusting.
Unfair and untransparent – avoid if you’re a guarantor or tenant I’m the father and guarantor of a former tenant whose flat became uninhabitable after flooding. The landlord’s agents told everyone to vacate and promised reimbursement for hotel costs. When that never happened, my son deducted the cost (£358) from his rent — after informing the agent, who agreed this was reasonable. Reposit later treated this as “unpaid rent” and used their so-called independent adjudicator, HF Resolution Ltd, whose directors have landlord business ties. They refused to name the adjudicator, citing “data protection,” which is absurd. Despite clear proof the building was evacuated, the case went against the tenant on the basis that he had not proved that the property was uninhabitable — and Reposit then took £358 from my bank card without consent. A completely opaque and biased process. Tenants and guarantors are far better off with a proper government-backed deposit scheme. Added after Reposit’s response: Unsurprisingly, Reposit now suggest that the rent was due because the landlord did not accept the withholding. But that is not why the adjudicator found against the tenant. The adjudicator’s decision stated: “While it has been acknowledged that some flooding occurred during the tenancy, … without any evidence showing the property was deemed uninhabitable, the tenant remains responsible for the full rent.” Habitability was never in dispute — the landlord’s own agents instructed all tenants to vacate and find temporary accommodation. Reposit’s claim that they had no control over the decision is plainly wrong: Reposit chose the adjudicator, a company with strong landlord ties and every incentive to find in favour of landlords. As to their point that “no evidence was provided that the landlord accepted the deduction,” this was in fact argued — and the landlord never sought payment after being told of the deduction. The adjudicator didn’t even mention this, proving how flawed the reasoning was Consumers deserve honesty and transparency. Reposit’s attempt to rewrite the facts of this case only reinforces why their process should be treated with caution
Poor communication throwout told me to end my tenancy with previous housing cause they could guarantee i had a property with then and then they let it to someone else despite paying deposits leaving me and my 2year old child homeless
We have just noticed a critical flaw in this software. We have an inventory company that used this software carry out inventories for us less than a year ago. As we stopped using the company they deleted all our inventories from there system. However this means all the inventories that we have had done even though they are saved in PDF cannot be opened and are useless. The inventory company does not want to make them live as they say they have to pay to host it. So be aware that your inventories can become useless. The inventory company is now making us pay for each inventory to become live again and there is nothing Inventory base can do to help you in this situation.
I have been trying to call this company for over a week, they have a phone number on there website which no one ever picks up. …
Scam company - do not use! - the fact they don’t even have a phone number shows they don’t want to hear the truths from their customers ( as we have A LOT to say). - They took a non refundable deposit back from my house before we moved in and are now trying to charge us £1600 for general wear and tear and gardening? after we cleaned the garden and professionally cleaned the house. - after reading our disagreements to the accusations, there was no acknowledgment of our arguments - just a straight up no. No context to why? - the fact we have to pay a £60 to dispute further is disgusting as students. - we have no way to speak to this company and it is unfair and disgraceful.
Me and and my house mates feel scammed by this website and our landlord, having extra payments here and there but being forced to use it to live in our previous house
Shameless scalpers. They charge £60 to dispute fees, so they can basically take £60 from you and you can't argue. The whole business model preys on people who can't afford the £500 deposit.
I would not recommend using this service. I’ve used Reposit as a student for two separate tenancies, and both experiences were disappointing. Had I known the outcome of the first, I wouldn’t have used it again. Initially, we paid £150 to use the service, only to be met with several unexpected additional charges later on. When we disputed some of these charges, the responses from Reposit felt generic—often seeming auto-generated. We were required to pay a £60 fee if we wanted to challenge their decision a second time. In my view, this system unfairly profits from students who may already be financially stretched and unable to afford a traditional deposit or the extra fees.
Unknown
7 Market Street, Darwen, Lancashire, BB3 1AZ, North West, UK, BB3
No team information available
No memberships information available
No marketing information available
No awards information available
No memberships information available
No marketing information available
No awards information available