We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy & you agree to the site's terms & condition

Zest

A selection of reviews/testimonials by highest rating
(in some cases, not all reviews/testimonials will be displayed)
1.00 /5

Very very poor customer service for tenants. Not recommend at all if you are tenant.

Reply from agent

Dear Kamelia. We are sorry to read this, especially as a number of colleagues went above and beyond to help you. We wish you every success in your future endeavours.

1.00 /5
Reply from agent

Hi zMaizR - we have absolutely no idea who you are and you haven't left any comments with your rating so please contact us if you would like to discuss this further. Many thanks.

1.00 /5

You need to be very careful with choosing this agency.I have been with this agency 3 years.Last year's experience was very disappointing. For half a year waited to fix taps, did not get any reply. Until landlord contact me and I fixed taps myself. They are charging exit fee after contract is finished, not for repairings, just exit fee. And if you need a reference from them you will pay £30 per person which I think is ridiculous, in our case would be £90 for just to send an email.

1.00 /5

Absolutely abysmal company, we were left with a broken shower and no downstairs lights for months and now that we've left, they won't give us our deposit back. I've heard that other people had a "honeymoon" period followed by their performance. I wish we had that. I'm still dealing with the same person I've made an official complaint against. This company is ill equipped to rent and they know it. I've filed a complaint and all I got was 125 pounds and a request to remove this review. I've been dealing with them via email for a year of my life. I'm more stressed about dealing zest than I am about my degree.

1.00 /5

(Former tenant) Things at the start of the tenancy lead us into a false sense of security about the quality of service from Zest. Into our tenancy the agent responsible for us changed jobs and we were left without a clear sense of who were to correspond with. Any comments we made fell on deaf ears. Emails were either completely ignored, or were responded to with empty promises of a return phone call/email, a brick wall has been known to be more responsive. On the rare occasions, we did receive correspondence, only 3/7 of the tenants were copied in. The landlords frequently showed up without notice multiple times, but despite being in breach of the contract, Zest did not care. The end of the tenancy you would've thought from the way we were handled they would've wanted to get rid of us asap, think again. It has taken us 41 days to receive a response for the return of our deposit. Their excuse "(They) returned from annual leave yesterday...this was not picked up in my absence"

1.00 /5

Previous tenant (2018/19). Zest lacks the ability to communicate and respond efficiently leading to damage of the property, unsafe living conditions and deductions to our deposit. Despite negotiating with them for months after check out we are yet to receive our deposit, their attempts at apologising seem half hearted and their sincerity only shows when asking us to remove our one star reviews.

1.00 /5

As a parent of a student who has used Zest services and as the financial contributor to the payments for these services I’d like to share our experience. The property developed a significant water leak from the shower which was reported immediately but ignored by Zest for several weeks and also not reported to the landlord. Downstairs lights needed to be disconnected for safety because of the moisture and damage to the ceiling. The shower was unusable during this time. The problem was only resolved after the council’s environmental health department contacted the landlord directly. A small amount of compensation was recently given after months of discussion but came with a request to amend a poor Google review. We understand the landlord has not renewed their contract with Zest. The return of the deposit has been a lengthy, stressful experience with Zest claiming costs for services not provided, replacement of fittings that never existed and the wear of old furniture. After repeated communications they’ve promised to resolve the issue but without agreement have now paid the contested sum to a student’s account. We discovered Zest had charged both the students and the landlord for services they didn’t provide, such as cleaning and removing rubbish. A month’s rental was returned at the end of the term when they realised the students had been overcharged at the beginning of the contract. With such a poor experience with Zest I’m afraid I’m suspicious of a deliberate overcharge. They don’t appear to be honest people. I wouldn’t recommend using Zest’s services. Zest, do not ask for the removal of this review via the student and do not ask again for the connected student to remove their review. Consider yourselves named and shamed.

Reply from agent

We feel it’s important to clear up some of the points that have been made incorrectly here. When the leak was reported, it was immediately sent on to the landlord to authorise; not ignored for several weeks as you suggest. A contractor was later sent to the property and, as we later discovered, unfortunately, mis-diagnosed the leak; replacing the sealant and not finding the root cause. When the tenants, a week later, reported the shower as leaking again, the landlord was once again immediately informed. We readily admit that the time it took from the second leak being reported to a successful repair was too long. We have incredibly high standards and agree that these were not met in this particular instance. Our Operations Director has been in constant communication with the lead tenant regarding this mater; has apologised several times, paid nearly £1000 in total compensation (contrary to the ‘small amount’ you suggest) including a donation to Mermaids, a charity supporting gender-diverse and transgender youth, as chosen by all tenants. When a mistake is made or we believe expectations are not met, we hold our hands up and try to make it right. It certainly is disheartening that, despite apologising and compensating, we are still painted in a negative light. As for the deposit- there appears to be some confusion here. As with all Letting Agents, we do not hold any deposits, they are all registered with a Government approved scheme. Zest do not make any deductions, they come from the landlord directly. We simply pass on the deductions from the landlord to the tenant and then advise the tenant of their options should they wish to dispute. The deductions come from the landlord, not from us the Agency. We simply facilitate the process and therefore any grievance in this regard is misplaced. Whilst many of the points in your review are factually incorrect, we nevertheless appreciate you taking the time to express your views and, once again, where we have fallen short, we sincerely apologise.

1.00 /5

Rip of stufenst. Stealing our deposits

Reply from agent

Hi Thomas- deductions are only made from deposits if the property is not left in the same state as it was upon move in (aside from expected wear and tear) your deposit is completely protected with our preferred provider, the DPS, and they will investigate any claim that is disputed. We do not hold any deposits.

1.00 /5

Terrible service: Do not turn up to house viewings, lie about the agreed time (when the prospective tenant has email proof), and are unhelpful.

Reply from agent

So sorry to hear about your experience Joshua, I can assure you that this is not common place as you can see from our other reviews. I can only apologise that we had a system error on the day of your viewing which meant that it wasn't lodged in the diary; we did apologise to you and offered an alternative time, which we understood you were unable to do because you had to return to University, but we tried everything to accommodate a viewing for you. Once again we are sorry for letting you down on this occasion.

1.00 /5

In a nutshell: "Carpetbaggers and Charlatans". Was a tenant for approximately 14 months. My experience with Zest started out reasonably okay for the first 40 days, though this standard dropped like rock from a height and shattered upon a hard cold ground - an understatement to say the least. Following on after the apparent honeymoon period, queries were left unanswered and at times had no responses at all. Rent was extortionate. Agency fees unreasonably extortionate. Customer service was absolutely shocking! They ignored maintenance issues relating to poor workmanship of various areas in the property. They were dishonest. They will attempt to obtain all or most of your deposit money in order to appease the landlord's at your expense - a massive conflict of interests, something I experienced with no end. Take note: On the Zest properties website, they boast: "In the last 12 months we have a DPS dispute rate of precisely 0%" - This is absolutely untrue, as my deposit was disputed via the DPS (And got most of it back). Their apparent award statements about being the "Best at this, and the Best at that .... " are unrealistic and questionable to say the least. My advice as a tenant would be to avoid Zest and go with an alternative, though should you decide to go with them take heed of what I have said. Watch out while you have the chance ....

Reply from agent

Dear “Lilly Green”, we would thank you for your feedback but we can find no record of any tenant going by that name in the whole of Zest’s history. We are happy to invite to our London Road office any prospective customers concerned by what they have read in your “review” and if necessary allow them to confirm for themselves that these comments are in fact spurious and malicious. If in reality you are a tenant who has recently pursued a dispute and are hiding behind a pseudonym then things become a little clearer. Naturally in every situation where damage is caused to a landlord’s property by the tenant, we will try to recover from the departing tenant an appropriate contribution to the cost of remediation. It is perhaps understandable that in some cases tenants are reluctant to take responsibility for the damage caused under their occupation, either by themselves directly or by other unspecified individuals. Until now, we have been able to resolve every situation of initial disagreement like this that we have ever faced through our negotiation with both parties who are (in some cases after frank exchanges of views) prepared to act responsibly. Unfortunately we can confirm that during the past week we have indeed experienced our first ever dispute where we were unsuccessful in reconciling both parties. As a result we are no longer able to claim a 100% record and will instead have to confess that in our 8-year history we have actually only managed successfully to resolve 99.95% of end-of-tenancy issues. Despite what “Lilly Green” may think, we act fairly and reasonably in trying to hold to account anyone who doesn’t do the right thing and that includes ourselves. While it may be true to say that our level of customer service has recently fallen somewhat short of our aspirations and reputation, we have taken decisive steps to invest in our people & systems to drive improvement to better serve our loyal, valued clients and continue to win awards. We recognise that in any situation there are multiple points of view and we genuinely always try to see things from all sides. In the spirit of actually doing the right thing rather than just talking about doing the right thing, we extend our invitation to come and talk things through to whoever “Lilly Green” really is so that we can consider any authentic grievance on a one-to-one basis.

Contact details

Unknown

Opening hours

Unknown

Address

1a Mile End London Road, Bath, Somerset, BA1 6PT, UK, BA1

No about information available

Our team

No team information available

No memberships information available

No marketing information available

No awards information available

No memberships information available

No marketing information available

No awards information available