We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy & you agree to the site's terms & condition

Martin & Co Croydon

A selection of reviews/testimonials by highest rating
(in some cases, not all reviews/testimonials will be displayed)
1.00 /5

Bullying, and generally abysmal experience from a tenant's perspective. Before our move-out date, they kept hounding us for additional viewings after having allowed one. I told them that we were unavailable on a specific week, yet they kept harassing me. A lady from Martin&Co (called Rugile, I believe) called me again, during that specific week I previously flagged we would be unavailable for, and tried pressuring us into a second viewing. She kept trying to aggravate me by cutting me off constantly on the phone and asking why I am being difficult. I clearly told her that we never rejected viewings, it's the specific date she asked for that wouldn't work for us. I also asked her whether an individual tenancy agreement would override STATUTORY RIGHTS; she - falsely - confirmed that it would, then put me on speaker phone in their office while trying to bully me. Unprofessional and shocking behaviour, honestly. Never received a clear apology for her behaviour either when I raised this with another point of contact from Martin&Co. **Edit: the director's response here is particularly misleading. First of all, contrary to their claim, we did allow a second viewing, even after their agent's disgusting behaviour; I merely asked Martin&Co to remove that specific person from any correspondence with us. The main issue was, all along, was how the agency handled one of their employees bullying tenants. Had they clearly apologised and admitted their fault, instead of this patronising narrative of theirs, it would have had completely different visuals. Furthermore, the suggestion that we, as ex-tenants, are somehow responsible for the landlord 'losing almost a month's rent' is risible, from multiple perspectives. Additionally, and in conjunction with the fact that the director's claim in itself is false - as we did allow two viewings, in accordance with the tenancy agreement -, the snide attack on character just sounds a bit silly and immature ('Personally though, had I signed agreeing to something, I wouldn’t go back on my word'). ** After moving out, the landlord tried to claim damages from the deposit. These were very clearly unreasonable and I won the dispute to its full extent. **Edit: Didn't think it was worth detailing this point further but the damage the LL tried to claim for had already been there when we moved in. It was visible on the check-in photos albeit being partially obstructed, and the claim in itself was a massive waste of everyone's time. One would be naive assuming a LL would lodge a claim against the deposit without consulting the letting's agent, especially with this LL's rapport; they proposed a lower rent than our offer and didn't raise in the second year of the tenancy. Nonetheless, fair enough, I've rephrased the above section to do it more justice. ** They also started generally ignoring any correspondence around relevant and reasonable queries once we gave notice of moving out. The cleaning company they recommended - Golden Kangaroo - was horrible, too. They never asked me during the booking phone call whether the flat was furnished or not, and then tried to bully me into paying an extra fee on top when they 'realised on arrival' that the property was indeed furnished. It'd be reasonable to argue the agency has financial ties to a cleaner they recommend, so it wouldn't be a stretch to say these companies try to fleece you wherever they can, hand in hand. **Edit: There was nothing 'libellous' in my phrasing. The suggestion is reasonable, and I would expect nothing less from a shady company that tries to mislead their tenants misquoting the law in a directly contradicting way and trying to harass them until they give in to an unreasonable number of viewings. It may just be a case of no one ever calling them out on this behaviour before. ** Please do not allow them any courtesy and try to stay away from Martin&Co. I have documentation that supports all of these points, naturally.

Reply from agent

Martin, Hi, thanks for your comments. I think this is a case of 'recollections may vary'... We are well aware of a tenant's statutory right to quiet enjoyment. Your contractual agreement to allow viewings with reasonable notice during the last two months of the tenancy does not over-ride this – in law, statute trumps contract. Personally though, had I signed agreeing to something, I wouldn’t go back on my word. As a consequence of your refusal to allow access on more than one occasion our client lost almost a month’s rent, as we were not able to show prospective new tenants the property until you had vacated. The reason the high resolution check-in photos from 2022 were not available is that the company that created the inventory ceased trading in 2023. We were asked by the landlord to seek a deduction from your deposit of £168 to cover removal of tape residue from a window and what he felt was damage beyond normal wear and tear to the paintwork on the front door. Having gone through the alternative dispute resolution process his claim was unsuccessful, but had it been found in his favour the £168 would have gone to the landlord not to us. We have no financial interest in implementing any deposit claim on behalf of landlords (rather the opposite, as they can be very time consuming for us also), however as we undertake deposit protection for most of our clients it is part of the service we provide. As we manage hundreds of properties we have many tradespeople that carry out work for us. Without exception (including the cleaners you mention) they are completely independent of us and there is no secret profit, mark-ups or referral fees. Your suggestion that we have ‘financial ties’ to Golden Kangaroo is actually libelous… Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director.

1.00 /5

I just had a call to schedule a house viewing, and the agent mentioned that viewings were set up between 10 AM and 4 PM. However, only the 12 to 1:30 PM slots were taken, yet he seemed unable to fill the 10 or 11 AM slots. Instead, I was … More

Reply from agent

Hi, for clarity the owners live at the house you enquired about and as they have a young family we have been given a narrow window on Saturday for viewings. You requested a time after 3pm (and did not discuss a morning appointment). My colleague explained that wouldn't be possible, but we could look for an alternative day that might be convenient for you. Instead of exploring this further you ended the call that you had made to us... Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director.

1.00 /5

I just had a call to schedule a house viewing, and the agent mentioned that viewings were set up between 10 AM and 4 PM. However, only the 12 to 1:30 PM slots were taken, yet he seemed unable to fill the 10 or 11 AM slots. Instead, I was asked to call back on Monday after I asked what the options were?! I really hope my own agent isn't handling potential buyers this way. I found the experience quite frustrating and unhelpful. To reply to manager below: I ended the call because your employee didn’t offer any options. I also specifically stated before 1 pm and after 3 pm and your colleague implied the owners enabled a slot from 10 to 4pm —please be accurate with the details. It’s ironic that he later emailed me to find a solution. Since you're dealing with customers, a cordial approach would be appreciated.

Reply from agent

Hi, for clarity the owners live at the house you enquired about and as they have a young family we have been given a narrow window on Saturday for viewings. You requested a time after 3pm (and did not discuss a morning appointment). My colleague explained that wouldn't be possible, but we could look for an alternative day that might be convenient for you. Instead of exploring this further you ended the call that you had made to us... Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director.

1.00 /5

We wanted to rent a flat that we really liked.but one of colleagues was bit rude to us.we been told that it’s rented but it’s still on market.not nice

Reply from agent

Galina, Hi, apologies if you found one of my colleagues to be rude, I'm sure that wasn't their intention. Unfortunately we had several prospective tenants interested in the property and the landlords made a decision this morning to go ahead with someone else. The property remains advertised until the successful applicant's holding deposit has cleared into our account. This was the email from my colleague Dhennusha to your partner Briken at 11.27am today: "Hello, Hope all is well. Unfortunately the landlord decided to go for another offer. I will let you know as soon as we have anything else to offer. Kind regards..." I do understand the search for a suitable property to rent can be very frustrating and I regret that we have been unable to help you with this one. Peter Brown, Director.

1.00 /5

the worst estate agent to contact when looking to rent, called 4 days in a row to inquire about viewing properties and all 4 days no one was available and was ask to leave name and number and someone would call back. Does anyone work there?

Reply from agent

Almaz, hi sorry your experience has not been a positive one. The answer to your question is yes and very hard. Unfortunately one of our lettings colleagues has been away on well earned annual leave and it's been difficult to help all the 230 people who have contacted us about renting a property in the last week as a consequence. Please give me a call directly on 0208 688 8565 and I will be delighted to assist you personally. Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director

1.00 /5

Subject: Complaint Regarding Staff Behavior - Urgent Attention Required Dear Admin, I am writing to formally lodge a complaint about the unacceptable behavior exhibited by two of your staff members, which occurred during a recent interaction with me and my family… On 24/08/2024.. I was involved in a situation with a male staff member, whom I believe is named Matt, and a female staff member with long red hair. This encounter left me feeling intimidated, bullied, and subjected to what I believe were racist remarks. Additionally, their actions caused my children to become extremely distressed to the point where they were crying and screaming. I had to seek refuge at a friend's house to calm them down, which was both unnecessary and deeply upsetting. Here is a summary of what occurred: 1….. Accusations and Aggressive Behaviour: The female staff member accused my husband of bumping into her colleague's car…. When I asked for evidence.. she changed her story and then abruptly left the scene when I started to question her… This was extremely unprofessional and confusing. 2. Racist and Offensive Language.. The male staff member, Matt, confronted me in an aggressive manner… He used foul language in front of my children, despite my request for him to refrain from swearing. He then made a remark that I found to be racist and deeply offensive, stating, "Oh, people like you..." When I asked for clarification, he laughed and continued to use derogatory language, calling me a "crazy woman." This behavior is not only unprofessional but also discriminatory. It is deeply concerning that your staff would treat a customer in this manner, especially in front of children. I believe it is crucial that Martin & Co. addresses this issue immediately to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future. I would appreciate a prompt investigation into this matter and a response detailing the actions that will be taken to address the behavior of these staff members. Thank you for your attention to this serious issue. Sincerely, Bebo

Reply from agent

Bebo Thank you for your posting regarding this matter, which I have already looked into. I am sorry to hear of any upset you and your children may have experienced, however I do not believe that this is the right forum to address this dispute. The incident on Saturday was a personal matter, with an argument between private individuals over damage to a stationary, privately-owned car in an accident irrefutably caused by your husband, who was driving, but which you denied, causing inevitable frustration. You are not a client or customer, the male colleague you refer to was not on company business and the female colleague you mention was there only in the capacity of a witness, having actually seen the accident occur. We have endeavoured to foster good relations with our neighbours in South Croydon over the last 15 years and will continue to work to be a productive part of the community. Therefore, as a gesture of goodwill, we will pay to repair the damage to our colleague’s vehicle, in order to avoid the need for a claim against your insurance. Please contact me directly at the office if you would like to discuss this matter any further. Peter Brown Director

1.00 /5

Awful agents. I have enquired about several properties and they have never come back to me. Some of those properties have been reduced after enquiring and have been on the market for weeks, so please don’t tell me they have been let. There is one in particular I enquired at it’s original price, today I have an email it has been reduced. Good luck to the landlord, you have already lost money.

Reply from agent

Patricia, hi thank you for taking the time to leave a review. Unfortunately, based on the information you provided, you are not earning enough to meet our normal income referencing criterion for the properties you have enquired about. As none of the landlords has wanted to consider a tenant with a guarantor we have been unable to help you in your search. Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director.

1.00 /5

Called to enquire about a property but seemed very uninterested and told me to email instead. No follow-up since.

Reply from agent

Thomas, hi thanks for bringing this to my attention. I am very surprised that you were told to email us - we receive many, many phone calls each day and endeavour to get everyone who rings us registered onto our CRM. I can see that you have sent an enquiry via rightmove about the property and we have tried to reach you twice in response to that so far. Unfortunately we have had a huge response for this property with over sixty enquiries in 24 hours and it has been difficult to contact everyone and get them booked in for viewings. Apologies for your inconvenience. If you would like to contact me directly on 0208 688 8565 or at peter.brown@martinco.com I will be delighted to assist you personally. Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director.

1.00 /5

I give one star just because isn't possible to give less than that. We rented a property that wasn't fit for the purpose at all. None of the doors was working,the kitchen and both bathrooms had a broken toilet bowl and serious damp problems(which later have been confirmed by a specialist),the house was given completely filthy and later we had a very bad pest problem caused by the dirt and the garden,that has never been cleaned in years. I understand that they didn't manage the property on behalf of the landlord. But before the agency puts it on the market,they should inspect it and advice the owner that if the house isn't in good conditions,he should take the appropriate actions in order to make it right. Obviously when we had the viewing,we didn't figure our this amount of issues and definitely we didn't go try the doors or open the cupboard in the main bathroom to see what was inside. These things should work and the house should be given in a good state.This is out of doubt and is common sense. Also,when we left,one of the agents commented that it was annoying because they had to put the property on the market all over again. What isn't clear about the fact that the property can't be rent in the current state? And above all, they put their name and reputation on that letting,which doesn't look good on them. I hope the house,that in 7 months has been a continuous aggravation for us,isn't let again as it is,because it is really a shame

Reply from agent

Rosella, hi i am sorry to learn that you had a bad experience in the property we introduced you to. We have let this property several times since 2014 -, with one couple living there for over 4 years - and prior to that it was the landlord's own home. We do not manage the property and the landlord is responsible for preparing the property between lets and for dealing with any issues that arise subsequently. We have not been aware of any mice problems at the house previously, but of course pest issues can arise at any property given the right circumstances. In our experience, this landlord has always been approachable and attentive, taking any issues seriously and leaving time between tenancies to prepare the house for new occupants. The property is currently vacant and has not been re-marketed, as the landlord has said he wishes to undertake some work there first. As we act for him only on a tenant finding basis, re-letting the house would be financially advantageous to us, so I'm unsure why we would feel annoyed by that. We will however ensure the matters you have brought to our attention have been addressed prior to doing so. Kind regards, Peter

1.00 /5

Tried to call them to enquire about a property, the guy on the phone couldnt hear me and complained it was too loud in his office. maybe, find a space where you can actually have a conversation on the phone without me having to repeat everything 5 times! Clownshoes

Reply from agent

James, Hi, I'm sorry you found this to be a frustrating experience. We are a very busy open-plan office - it can be noisy at times with 10 people on the phone at the same time. Also, where we are being called from mobile phones, lines aren't always the best. I'm sure we could have worked through it, if you had been a little bit more patient and not hung up on my colleague..... Please give me a call directly on 0208 688 8565 if we may still be of assistance and I will call you back from somewhere quieter if need be. Kind regards, Peter Brown, Director.

Contact details
Sales Phone:

0208 688 8565

Sales Email:

croydon@martinco.com

Lettings Phone:

020 8688 8565

Lettings Email:

croydon@martinco.com

Opening hours

Unknown

Address

145 Brighton Road, South Croydon, CR2 6EF, UK, CR2

We specialise in selling houses and residential lettings in Croydon, Purley, Kenley and the surrounding suburbs and provide expert advice, guidance and support to our customers across the local area. Joint Directors Peter Brown & Paul Maruna together have over 40 years of industry experience and opened Martin & Co Croydon in 2009. With enviable local knowledge they're both passionate about supporting local people in fulfilling their everyday property needs. Croydon lies between fashionable South London and affluent Surrey and is only 10 miles from the centre of London. Rental prices are much more affordable than those further into Capital and the area is heavily populated with both commuters and families. Whether you are looking to buy or sell a property in or around Croydon or you would like a free valuation, please do get in touch with a member of our team who would be delighted to help.

Our team

No team information available

No memberships information available

No marketing information available

No memberships information available

No marketing information available